Divorce Advice Articles Section
How Do We Divide Our Property in a Divorce?
Martha and Tom have been married for 35 years. She stayed home
and took care of the four children. Tom earns $150,000 per year
and has started a business in the basement of their home, which
he expects will bring in revenues after he retires from the corporation
he works for. They own their home, worth $135,000. It is paid off.
He has his pension, which has been valued at $90,000. They have
a savings account with $28,000, and he values the business at $75,000.
Their assets total $328,000. Assuming a 50/50 property split, each
would receive $164,000.
|
House:
|
$135,000
|
|
Pension:
|
$90,000
|
|
Savings:
|
$28,000
|
|
Business:
|
$75,000
|
|
Total:
|
$328,000
|
These are their assets.
However, splitting the property and assets down the middle is often
not the most equitable division. In this case, as in nearly all
divorces, Martha wants the house. It is not unusual for the wife
to have an emotional attachment to the house, especially if that
is where she raised the children.
Tom also says, "I have a business deal coming up soon and
I am going to need cash for that deal. I must have the savings account."
Put the savings account in his column.
Then Tom says, "The business in the basement is mine. You
don't know what it looks like and you don't even have an idea of
what I do." Put the business in his column.
Here's what the division looks like.
|
Asset
|
Value
|
HER
|
HIM
|
|
House:
|
$135,000
|
$135,000
|
|
|
Pension:
|
$90,000
|
|
$90,000
|
|
Savings:
|
$28,000
|
|
$28,000
|
|
Business:
|
$75,000
|
|
$75,000
|
|
Total:
|
$328,000
|
$135,000
|
$193,000
|
Her assets total $135,000 and his assets total $193,000. If we
were to look at a 50/50 property split, he would owe her $29,000.
Although Tom has a large income of $150,000 a year, he does not
want to give up any of the business or pension or savings.
We can even out this division with a Property Settlement Note.
Tom can pay Martha $29,000 over time, like a note at the bank. He
can make monthly payments with current market interest. Or, he can
borrow funds directly from the bank, since he has assets, including
a savings account comparable to what he would owe.
Property Settlement Note
A Property Settlement Note is from the payer to the payee for an
agreed-upon length of time with reasonable interest. It is still
considered division of property, so the payer does not deduct it
from taxable income. The payee does not pay taxes on the principal
-- only on the interest. It is important to collateralize this note.
Let's go back to Martha and Tom. Martha does not like this settlement.
She says, "I want the house and I want half of your pension.
We have been married for 35 years and I helped you earn that pension."
Place the house ($135,000) in her column and half of the pension
($45,000) in each column. Then she says, "I want half of the
savings account. You are not going to leave me without any cash."
Put $14,000 in each column. She agrees that the business is Tom's,
so $75,000 is placed in his column. The property split now looks
like this:
|
Asset
|
Value
|
HER
|
HIM
|
|
House:
|
$135,000
|
$135,000
|
|
|
Pension:
|
$90,000
|
$45,000
|
$45,000
|
|
Savings:
|
$28,000
|
$14,000
|
$14,000
|
|
Business:
|
$75,000
|
|
$75,000
|
|
Total:
|
$328,000
|
$194,000
|
$134,000
|
Her assets are valued at $194,000, his at $134,000. Martha owes
Tom $30,000 to make a 50/50 property settlement. It's not that simple.
She does not have a job, has arthritis, and cannot walk very well.
In reality, Martha is not in good health and is unlikely she would
be able to get a job.
Her largest asset is the house, an illiquid asset. It is paid for,
but it does not create revenues to buy groceries. How is she going
to pay this $30,000 to him? Given that the prospects for this are
bleak, Martha and Tom's attorneys need to take another try at dividing
the assets.
These are the facts: (1) Martha is an older housewife with no work
experience, (2) marriage is long-term, (3) the largest asset (the
house) is an illiquid asset, and (4) Tom has a continuing business.
Given these facts, it is possible that she could get a larger, disproportionate
amount of the marital assets.
|